4.6 Article

Full-scale scores of the Mini Mental State Examination can be generated from an abbreviated version

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 64, 期 9, 页码 1005-1013

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.11.014

关键词

Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE); Short form MMSE; Cognitive assessment; Aging; Cognitive impairment; Imputation analysis

资金

  1. European Research Area in Ageing (ERA-Age) Future Leaders of Ageing Postdoctoral Fellowship
  2. Medical Research Council
  3. Cancer Research UK
  4. Research into Ageing
  5. MRC [G0701539, MC_U105292687] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Medical Research Council [G1000143, G0701539, G0401527, MC_U105292687] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To determine whether the full Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) scale range can be derived from an abbreviated 11-item version that was designed for testing general cognitive function in a cohort where only a small proportion were expected to be severely impaired or demented. Study Design and Setting: Using simple computation and multiple imputation, the properties of the abbreviated MMSE were compared with the full MMSE score using data from the Medical Research Council Cognitive Function and Ageing Study. Results: Full MMSE scores can be generated for the abbreviated version by assuming high functioning on excluded items. Of the imputed scores, 88.8% were within 1 point of their true value. When the sample was restricted to individuals with normal cognitive functioning (MMSE total score >= 24/30), 96.7% of individuals were classified within I point of their true total score. The model worked best at predicting cognitive level when cutoff scores were used to classify individuals into impaired vs. not nonimpaired. Conclusion: Full-scale MMSE scores can be reasonably accurately derived from an 11-item abbreviated version. This reduced version can be applied within other frameworks that require reduced test length but need results that are comparable to studies where the full version has been administered. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据