4.6 Article

An adherence self-report questionnaire facilitated the differentiation between nonadherence and nonresponse to antihypertensive treatment

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 61, 期 3, 页码 282-288

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.04.007

关键词

adherence; compliance; hypertension; self-assessment; questionnaire; validation; primary care

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: To evaluate, among hypertensive patients, a brief adherence self-report questionnaire (ASRQ), using electronic monitors (medical event monitoring system, MEMS) as the gold standard comparator. Study Design and Setting: A total of 239 patients with hypertension in five general practices in Bristol, UK completed the ASRQ before and at the end of the 4-week study period. Patients were asked to choose one of six descriptions (from level 1 = perfect adherence to level 6 = nonadherence) to express their medication taking. The main outcome measure was timing adherence (correct interdose intervals) as measured through electronic monitors. Results: Most patients (89%) stated perfect or nearly perfect adherence, and data from the electronic monitors showed a mean timing adherence of 88.3% (n = 216). Using the cutoff of those who reported ASRQ levels 1 and 2 (all tablets taken but not always at the same time of day), a high percentage of those with comparatively high adherence according to MEMS were correctly identified (specificity, 90-93%; negative predictive value, 66-96%). However, sensitivity (detection of true nonadherers) and positive predictive value were poor to moderate (14-42% and 22-66%, respectively). Conclusion: The questionnaire could be a useful aid to facilitate the difficult differentiation between nonadherence and nonresponse to prescribed antihypertensive medication. (C) 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据