4.7 Article

Novel Activating Mutations of the Calcium-Sensing Receptor: The Calcilytic NPS-2143 Mitigates Excessive Signal Transduction of Mutant Receptors

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
卷 95, 期 10, 页码 E229-E233

出版社

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/jc.2010-0651

关键词

-

资金

  1. Charite-University Medicine Berlin
  2. Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg [AZ 08.12.18.1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context and Objective: Activating mutations in the calcium-sensing receptor (CaSR) gene cause autosomal dominant hypocalcemia (ADH). The aims of the present study were the functional characterization of novel mutations of the CaSR found in patients, the comparison of in vitro receptor function with clinical parameters, and the effect of the allosteric calcilytic NPS-2143 on the signaling of mutant receptors as a potential new treatment for ADH patients. Methods: Wild-type and mutant CaSR (T151R, P221L, E767Q, G830S, and A844T) were expressed in human embryonic kidney cells (HEK 293T). Receptor signaling was studied by measuring intracellular free calcium in response to different concentrations of extracellular calcium ([Ca(2+)](o)) in the presence or absence of NPS-2143. Results: All ADH patients had lowered serum calcium ranging from 1.7 to 2.0 mM and inadequate intact PTH and urinary calcium excretion. In vitro testing of CaSR mutations from these patients revealed exaggerated [Ca(2+)](o)-induced cytosolic Ca(2+) responses with EC(50) values for [Ca(2+)](o) ranging from 1.56 to 3.15 mM, which was lower than for the wild-type receptor (4.27 mM). The calcilytic NPS-2143 diminished the responsiveness to [Ca(2+)](o) in the CaSR mutants T151R, E767Q, G830S, and A844T. The mutant P221L, however, was only responsive when coexpressed with the wild-type CaSR. Conclusion: Calcilytics might offer medical treatment for patients with autosomal dominant hypocalcemia caused by calcilytic-sensitive CaSR mutants. (J Clin Endocrinol Metab 95: E229-E233, 2010)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据