4.7 Article

The role of stereotactic radiotherapy in patients with growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenoma

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
卷 93, 期 7, 页码 2546-2552

出版社

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/jc.2008-0135

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context: Single-session stereotactic radiotherapy (SR) may be a potential adjuvant treatment in acromegaly. Objective: We analyzed the safety and efficacy of SR in patients who had previously received maximal surgical debulking at our center. Design: The study was a retrospective analysis of hormonal, radiological, and ophthalmologic data collected in a predefined protocol from 1994 through 2006. Setting: The study was performed at a university hospital. Patients: Eighty-three acromegalic patients, 52 women and 31 men, with a mean age of 42.6 +/- 1.2 yr, participated in the study. The median follow-up was 69 months (interquartile range 44-107 months). Intervention: The patients were treated with SR for residual or recurrent GH-secreting adenoma. Main Outcome Measure: Normalization of age- and sex-adjusted IGF-I levels together with a basal GH level below 2.5 mu g/liter without concomitant GH-suppressive drugs was the goal of therapy. Results: Fifty patients (60.2%) reached the main outcome of the study. The rate of remission was 52.6% at 5 yr [95% confidence interval (CI) 40.6-64.6%]. Another 13 patients (15.7%), who were resistant to somatostatin analogs, were in remission after SR. Multivariate analysis showed that low basal GH and IGF-I levels were associated with a favorable outcome. No serious side effects occurred after SR. The 5-yr cumulative risk of new onset hypogonadism, hypothyroidism, or hypoadrenalism was 3.6% ( 95% CI 0-8.6%), 3.3% ( 95% CI 0-7.7%), and 4.9% ( 95% CI 0-10.4%), respectively. Conclusion: In a highly selected group of acromegalic patients, SR treatment had good efficacy and safety. This may lead to reconsider the role of SR in the therapeutic algorithm of acromegaly.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据