4.7 Article

High prevalence of central adrenal insufficiency in patients with Prader-Willi syndrome

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
卷 93, 期 5, 页码 1649-1654

出版社

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/jc.2007-2294

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Context: The annual death rate of Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) patients is very high (3%). Many of these deaths are sudden and unexplained. Objective: Because most deaths occur during moderate infections and PWS patients suffer from various hypothalamic insufficiencies, we investigated whether PWS patients suffer from central adrenal insufficiency (CAI) during stressful conditions. Design: Overnight single-dose metyrapone tests were performed. Metyrapone (30 mg/kg) was administered at 2330 h. At 0400, 0600, and 0730 h, ACTH, 11-deoxycortisol, cortisol, and glucose levels were measured. Diurnal salivary cortisol profiles were assessedona different day at wake-up, 30 min after wake-up, at 1400 h, and at 2000 h. Setting: The study was conducted in a pediatric intensive care unit. Patients: Patients included 25 randomly selected PWS patients. Main Outcome Measure: Patients were considered as having CAI when ACTH levels remained below 33 pmol/liter at 0730 h. Results: Median (interquartile range) age was 9.7 (6.8-13.6) yr. Fifteen patients (60%) had an insufficient ACTH response (CAI, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in age, gender, genotype, and body mass index SD score between patients with CAI and those without. Morning salivary cortisol levels and diurnal profiles were normal in all children, suggesting that CAI becomes apparent only during stressful conditions. Conclusions: Strikingly, 60% of our PWS patients had CAI. The high percentage of CAI in PWS patients might explain the high rate of sudden death in these patients, particularly during infection-related stress. Based on our data, one should consider treatment with hydrocortisone during acute illness in PWS patients unless CAI has recently been ruled out with a metyrapone test.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据