4.0 Article

Osteoporosis: Evaluation of Screening Patterns in a Primary-Care Group Practice

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY
卷 11, 期 4, 页码 498-502

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2008.08.104

关键词

Osteoporosis Screening; osteoporosis prevention; family practice; group practice; internal medicine; primary care

资金

  1. Novartis Pharmaceuticals

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An estimated half of all women aged older than 50 yr will have an osteoporosis-related fracture in their lifetime. National osteoporosis clinical guidelines for screening recommend measurement of bone mineral density in average risk women beginning at age 65 yr. Little data are available regarding compliance with this recommendation. The objective of this study was to evaluate osteoporosis screening rates in a random sample of women, aged 66 yr or older, in a large multisite primary-care group practice. The study was conducted in a primary-care group practice serving over 180,000 patients in the Denver metropolitan area. Medical records of a random sample of 833 female patients aged 66 yr or older were reviewed retrospectively. Patients were seen at 1 of 13 practice locations, by 1 of 34 physicians. who practiced either family medicine or internal medicine. The frequency of osteoporosis screening was calculated. Accepted methods of screening include peripheral bone density measurement by ultrasound or dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), or central DXA. The physician-specific osteoporosis screening rates varied widely, ranging from 19% to 97%. The practice-specific osteoporosis screening rates ranged from 26% to 91%. Overall, the mean rate of osteoporosis screening among all physicians was 56%. Despite improvements in osteoporosis screening. there continues to be a gap in the quality of care provided compared to national recommended guidelines. Policy changes, performance improvement measures, and interventions are needed to improve screening rates in primary-care practices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
Review Endocrinology & Metabolism

Follow-up bone mineral density testing: 2023 official positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry

Linsey U. Gani, Chanika Sritara, Robert D. Blank, Weiwen Chen, Julia Gilmour, Ruban Dhaliwal, Ranjodh Gill

Summary: Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the gold standard method for measuring bone mineral density (BMD), which is strongly associated with fracture risk. The International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) has released new official positions on follow-up DXA examinations, highlighting the importance of considering the clinical context and individualized testing intervals.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY (2024)

Article Endocrinology & Metabolism

Bone mineral density derived from cardiac CT scans: Using contrast enhanced scans for opportunistic screening

Andia Cheneymann, Josephine Therkildsen, Simon Winther, Louise Nissen, Jesper Thygesen, Bente L. Langdahl, Ellen-Margrethe Hauge, Morten Bottcher

Summary: Osteoporosis is often overlooked, and contrast-enhanced CT scans used for other diseases may overestimate bone mineral density. Adjustments for this effect are necessary before contrast-enhanced images can be clinically utilized for BMD screening.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY (2024)