4.7 Article

Evaluation of Historical Diurnal Temperature Range Trends in CMIP5 Models

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLIMATE
卷 26, 期 22, 页码 9077-9089

出版社

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00032.1

关键词

Extreme events; Climate change; Coupled models; Trends

资金

  1. Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Climate System Science [CE 110001028]
  2. NCI National Facility at the ANU

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Diurnal temperature range (DTR) is a useful index of climatic change in addition to mean temperature changes. Observational records indicate that DTR has decreased over the last 50 yr because of differential changes in minimum and maximum temperatures. However, modeled changes in DTR in previous climate model simulations of this period are smaller than those observed, primarily because of an overestimate of changes in maximum temperatures. This present study examines DTR trends using the latest generation of global climate models participating in phase 5 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) and utilizes the novel CMIP5 detection and attribution experimental design of variously forced historical simulations (natural-only, greenhouse gas-only, and all anthropogenic and natural forcings). Comparison of observed and modeled changes in DTR over the period of 1951-2005 again reveals that global DTR trends are lower in model simulations than observed across the 27-member multimodel ensemble analyzed here. Modeled DTR trends are similar for both experiments incorporating all forcings and for the historical experiment with greenhouse gases only, while no DTR trend is discernible in the naturally forced historical experiment. The persistent underestimate of DTR changes in this latest multimodel evaluation appears to be related to ubiquitous model deficiencies in cloud cover and land surface processes that impact the accurate simulation of regional minimum or maximum temperatures changes observed during this period. Different model processes are likely responsible for subdued simulated DTR trends over the various analyzed regions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据