4.7 Article

Evaluation of the Hydrometeor Layers in the East and West Pacific within ISCCP Cloud-Top Pressure-Optical Depth Bins Using Merged CloudSat and CALIPSO Data

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLIMATE
卷 26, 期 23, 页码 9429-9444

出版社

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00207.1

关键词

Clouds; Cloud retrieval; Remote sensing; Satellite observations

资金

  1. NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory [1228646]
  2. NASA [NNX07AT45G, NNX10AM42G]
  3. NASA [NNX10AM42G, 128311] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The International Satellite Cloud Climatology Project (ISCCP) provides a multidecadal and global description of cloud properties that are often grouped into joint histograms of column visible optical depth and effective cloud-top pressure P-top. It has not been possible until recently to know the actual distributions of hydrometeor layers within the ISCCP P-top- bins. Distributions of hydrometeor layers within the ISCCP P-top- conditional probability space using measurements from the CloudSat Cloud Profiling Radar and the Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations (CALIPSO) lidar within two 40 degrees x 40 degrees regions in the eastern and western equatorial Pacific over a 2-yr period are examined. With the exception of thin cirrus and stratocumulus, the authors show that of the P-top- types that are commonly analyzed, none of the types contain unique distributions of geometrically defined layer types but tend to be populated by diverse sets of hydrometeor layers whose bulk profile properties conspire to render specific radiative signatures when interpreted by two-channel visible and IR sensors from space. In comparing the geometric distribution of cloud layers for common P-top- types, it is found that the ISCCP Cirrostratus, Deep Convection, and Stratocumulus types appear to have been drawn from a common geometric distribution of hydrometeor layers. The other six common ISCCP P-top- types do not share this feature. The authors can confidently reject an assumption that even though they have common top-of-atmosphere radiative signatures, they do not appear to share a common distribution of cloud layers and therefore are likely to have significantly different radiative heating profiles and different surface radiative forcing even though their top-of-atmosphere radiative signatures are similar.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据