4.7 Article

Cleaner chlorine production using oxygen depolarized cathodes? A life cycle assessment

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 80, 期 -, 页码 46-56

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.05.086

关键词

Chlor-alkali electrolysis; Oxygen depolarized cathodes; Electricity demand reduction; Life cycle assessment; Environmental impacts

资金

  1. project Life cycle assessment of ODC-technology for chlorine production [01LS0901D]
  2. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chlorine and caustic soda are two indispensable chemical commodities co-produced in the so-called chlor-alkali electrolysis. Chlor-alkali electrolysis is today a target for cleaner production because of its large electricity demand causing considerable envitonmental impacts. The electricity demand of chloralkali electrolysis can be reduced by 30% using oxygen depolarized cathodes (ODCs) instead of the standard cathodes (STCs) used today. However, ODCs require additional resources and do not produce hydrogen in contrast to existing chlor-alkali plants. This work investigates if the reduction in electricity demand also contributes to cleaner production. For this purpose, environmental impacts from chloralkali electrolysis using ODCs are compared to the impacts from best available existing chlor-alkali plants using STCs. The life cycle assessment includes manufacturing, operation and disposal of the plants. To account for utilization of hydrogen from existing chlor-alkali plants, two alternative utilization scenarios are studied: energy recovery by combustion of hydrogen and use of hydrogen as chemical commodity. Seven environmental impact categories are studied in detail using the ReCiPe method. Chloralkali electrolysis using ODCs yields lower environmental impacts in up to six environmental impact categories. Plant operation contributes most in six out of seven impact categories. Chlor-alkali electrolysis using ODCs has thus potential to contribute to cleaner production in the chlor-alkali industry. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据