4.7 Article

Analysis of institutional adaptation: integration of biodiversity conservation into forestry

期刊

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
卷 19, 期 16, 页码 1822-1832

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.04.001

关键词

Policy implementation; Organizational adaptation; Institutional analysis; Forest management; Biodiversity conservation

资金

  1. Finnish Academy [206020, 122381]
  2. Maj and Tor Nessling Foundation
  3. Finnish Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry
  4. Ministry of the Environment
  5. European Union
  6. Academy of Finland (AKA) [206020, 122381, 122381, 206020] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Integrating biodiversity conservation into forest management requires changes in the practices of those public and private actors that have implementing responsibilities and whose strategic and operational opportunities are at stake. Understanding this kind of context-dependent institutional adaptation entails bridging between two analytical approaches: policy implementation and organizational adaptation. This article combines these two approaches by reviewing them, and their caveats, and by summarizing empirical analyses of organizational competences. specialization, professional judgment, and organizational networks in the organizational field of non-industrial private forestry in Finland. Drawing on these theoretical and empirical analyses, the article discloses the broad phenomenon of institutional adaptation in the integration of biodiversity conservation and forest management. The empirical analyses point to the dominance of hierarchical policy implementation over strategic organizational adaptation. Together with the detected isomorphism of professional norms and networks, these contribute to meeting minimum standards but can constrain the ways in which the organizations and professionals respond to the challenge of biodiversity conservation. The detected inertia signals lack of alertness. It is perhaps also an indication of self-sufficiency among the actors. The interpretation of these responses to challenges and responsibilities across the public and private sector boundaries demonstrates the necessity of combining the two traditionally segregated approaches. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据