4.5 Article

Combinative application of pH-zone-refining and conventional high-speed counter-current chromatography for preparative separation of alkaloids from Stephania kwangsiensis

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2011.02.051

关键词

Stephania kwangsiensis; pH-zone-refining CCC; Conventional HSCCC; Preparative chromatography; Alkaloids

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [20872083]
  2. Major National ST Program [2010ZX09401-302-5-12]
  3. Key Science and Technology Program of Shandong Province
  4. Institute of Chinese Material Medical, CACMS [ZZ20090107]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A method which involves the combination of pH-zone-refining counter-current chromatography (pH-zone-refining CCC) and conventional high-speed counter-current chromatography (HSCCC) was established for the preparative separation of alkaloids from the crude extracts of Stephania kwangsiensis. pH-zone-refining CCC was first performed with the solvent system composed of n-hexane-ethyl acetate-methanol-water (3:7:1:9, v/v), where triethylamine (10 mM) was added to the upper organic stationary phase as a retainer and hydrochloric acid (5 mM) to the aqueous mobile phase as an eluter. From 2.0 g of crude extract, 370 mg of sinoacutine and 600 mg of a mixture of three other alkaloids were obtained. Then, the mixture was further separated by conventional HSCCC with the solvent system composed of n-hexane-ethyl acetate-methanol-water (7:3:6:4, v/v), yielding 42 mg of (-)-crebanine, 50 mg of (-)-stephanine and 30 mg of l-romerine from 150 mg mixture of three other alkaloids, respectively. The purities of the four compounds were all over 98% as determined by HPLC, and the chemical structures of the four compounds were confirmed by positive ESI-MS and H-1 NMR data. Results of the present study successfully indicated that this method was efficient for the preparative separation of alkaloids from natural plants. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据