4.5 Article

Quantification of cationic anti-malaria agent methylene blue in different human biological matrices using cation exchange chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2008.01.028

关键词

methylene blue; cation exchange chromatography; tandem mass spectrometry; whole blood; plasma; paper spots

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Selective and sensitive methods for the determination of the cationic dye and anti-malarial methylene blue in human liquid whole blood, dried whole blood (paper spot), and plasma depending on protein precipitation and cation exchange chromatography coupled to electrospray ionisation (ESI) tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) have been developed, validated according to FDA standards, and applied to samples of healthy individuals and malaria patients within clinical studies. Acidic protein precipitation with acetonitrile and trifluoroacetic acid was used for liquid whole blood and plasma. For the extraction of methylene blue from paper spots aqueous acetonitrile was used. Sample extracts were chromatographed on a mixed mode column (cation exchange/reversed phase, Uptisphere MM I) using an aqueous ammonium acetate/acetonitrile gradient. Methylene blue was quantified with MS/MS in the selected reaction monitoring mode using ESI and methylene violet 3RAX as internal standard. Depending on the sample volume (whole blood and plasma 250 mu L, and 100 mu L on paper spots) the method was linear at least within 75 and 10,000 ng/mL and the limit of quantification in all matrices was 75 ng/mL. Batch-to-batch accuracies of the whole blood, plasma, and paper spot methods varied between -4.5 and +6.6%, -3.7 and +7.5%, and -5.8 and +11.1%, respectively, with corresponding precision ranging from 3.8 to 11.8% CV. After a single oral dose (500mg) methylene blue concentrations were detectable for 72h in plasma. The methods were applied within clinical studies to samples from healthy individuals and malaria patients from Burkina Faso. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据