4.6 Article

Relative hydrophobicity between the phases and partition of cytochrome-c in glycine ionic liquids aqueous two-phase systems

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
卷 1305, 期 -, 页码 1-6

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2013.06.066

关键词

Relative hydrophobicity; Extraction of cytochrome-c; Glycine ionic liquids; Aqueous two-phase systems

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21133009]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China [2009CB219902]
  3. Science and Technology Research Key Project of Henan Educational Committee [13A150511]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, glycine ionic liquids tetramethylammonium glycine ([N-1111][Gly]), tetraethylammonium glycine ([N-2222][Gly]), tetra-n-butylammonium glycine ([N-4444][Gly]), tetra-n-butylphosphonium glycine ([P-4444][Gly]) and tetra-n-pentylammonium glycine ([N-5555][Gly]) were synthesized and used to prepare aqueous two-phase systems (ATPSs) in the presence of K2HPO4. Binodal curves of such ATPSs and partition coefficients of a series of dinitrophenylated (DNP) amino acids in these ATPSs were determined at 298.15K to understand the effect of cationic structure of the ionic liquids on the phase-forming ability of glycine ionic liquids, relative hydrophobicity between the phases in the ionic liquids ATPSs, and polarity of the ionic liquids-rich phases. With the attempt to correlate the relative hydrophobicity of the phases in the ATPSs with their extraction capability for proteins, partition coefficients of cytochrome-c in the ATPSs were also determined. It was shown that partition coefficients of cytochrome-c were in the range from 2.83 to 20.7 under the studied pH conditions. Then, hydrophobic interactions between cytochrome-c and the ionic liquid are suggested to be the main driving force for the preferential partition of cytochrome-c in the glycine ionic liquid-rich phases of the ATPSs. Result derived from polarity of the ionic liquids-rich phases supports this mechanism. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据