4.6 Article

Ion-trap versus time-of-flight mass spectrometry coupled to capillary electrophoresis to analyze biogenic amines in wine

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
卷 1195, 期 1-2, 页码 150-156

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2008.05.004

关键词

capillary electrophoresis; mass spectrometry; CE-MS; food analysis; biogenic amines; wine; beverages

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this work, two different capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometry (CE-MS) methods, namely, capillary electrophoresis-ion-trap mass spectrometry (CE-IT-MS) and capillary electrophoresis-time-of-flight mass spectrometry (CE-TOF-MS), applied to analyze biogenic amines in wine samples are investigated. A group of five amines was selected as case study (namely, putrescine, cadaverine, histamine, phenylethylamine and tyramine) since they are the most frequently biogenic amines found in wines. The possibilities of both instruments in terms of sensitivity, selectivity and quantitation. during the determination of the mentioned biogenic amines in wine samples was studied and their results corroborated by HPLC. After optimization of the analytical conditions, CE-IT-MS and CE-TOF-MS allowed the identification of biogenic amines in wines without any previous treatment except diluting 1:1 with water and filtering. Biogenic amines were determined in three red wines and one white wine showing, as expected, a higher concentration in red wines. Moreover, CE-IT-MS and CE-TOF-MIS were compared regarding their capacity to detect other biogenic amines different to the selected ones in wine samples, showing CE-TOF-MS a much better capability (i.e., putrescine, cadaverine, histamine, phenylethylamine, tyramine, triptamine, spermidine, spermine, ethanolamine and isoamylamine were identified by CE-TOF-MS in a single analysis). Moreover, CE-TOF-MIS allowed the quantitation of biogenic amines with limits of detection as low as 10 ng/mL, comparable to those obtained using HPLC with fluorescence detection, without any previous derivatization step and with analysis times fivefold faster (40 min by HPLC and 8 min by CE-TOF-MS). (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据