Annual Research Review: Embracing not erasing contextual variability in children’s behavior - theory and utility in the selection and use of methods and informants in developmental psychopathology
出版年份 2012 全文链接
标题
Annual Research Review: Embracing not erasing contextual variability in children’s behavior - theory and utility in the selection and use of methods and informants in developmental psychopathology
作者
关键词
-
出版物
JOURNAL OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY
Volume 53, Issue 5, Pages 558-574
出版商
Wiley
发表日期
2012-02-24
DOI
10.1111/j.1469-7610.2012.02537.x
参考文献
相关参考文献
注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。- Informant Discrepancies in Clinical Reports of Youths and Interviewers' Impressions of the Reliability of Informants
- (2011) Andres De Los Reyes et al. JOURNAL OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
- Informants Are Not All Equal: Predictors and Correlates of Clinician Judgments About Caregiver and Youth Credibility
- (2011) Eric A. Youngstrom et al. JOURNAL OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
- When Parent and Teacher Ratings Don't Agree: The Tracking Adolescents' Individual Lives Survey (TRAILS)
- (2011) David C. Rettew et al. JOURNAL OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
- Research Domain Criteria (RDoC): Toward a New Classification Framework for Research on Mental Disorders
- (2010) Thomas Insel et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY
- The comparability of mother-report structured interviews and checklists for the quantification of youth externalizing symptoms
- (2010) Melanie A. Dirks et al. JOURNAL OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY
- Cognitive bias modification training in adolescents: effects on interpretation biases and mood
- (2010) Claudia Lothmann et al. JOURNAL OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY
- Meta-analyses of agreement between diagnoses made from clinical evaluations and standardized diagnostic interviews
- (2009) David C. Rettew et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF METHODS IN PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH
- Nosology and measurement in child and adolescent psychiatry
- (2009) Adrian Angold et al. JOURNAL OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY
- Situational and generalised conduct problems and later life outcomes: evidence from a �New Zealand birth cohort
- (2009) David M. Fergusson et al. JOURNAL OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY
- Research Review: ‘Ain’t misbehavin’: Towards a developmentally-specified nosology for preschool disruptive behavior
- (2009) Lauren S. Wakschlag et al. JOURNAL OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY
- Should there be separate parent and teacher-based categories of ODD? Evidence from a general population
- (2009) Linda Munkvold et al. JOURNAL OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY
- Rethinking environmental contributions to child and adolescent psychopathology: A meta-analysis of shared environmental influences.
- (2009) S. Alexandra Burt PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN
- Item Response Theory and Clinical Measurement
- (2008) Steven P. Reise et al. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology
- How far are associations between child, family and community factors and child psychopathology informant-specific and informant-general?
- (2008) Stephan Collishaw et al. JOURNAL OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY
- Observational Assessment of Preschool Disruptive Behavior, Part I: Reliability of the Disruptive Behavior Diagnostic Observation Schedule (DB-DOS)
- (2008) LAUREN S. WAKSCHLAG et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY
- Observational Assessment of Preschool Disruptive Behavior, Part II: Validity of the Disruptive Behavior Diagnostic Observation Schedule (DB-DOS)
- (2008) LAUREN S. WAKSCHLAG et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY
- An Item Response Theory Analysis of DSM-IV Conduct Disorder
- (2008) Heather Gelhorn et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY
Add your recorded webinar
Do you already have a recorded webinar? Grow your audience and get more views by easily listing your recording on Peeref.
Upload NowBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started