4.5 Article

Left perirhinal cortex codes for similarity in meaning between written words: Comparison with auditory word input

期刊

NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA
卷 76, 期 -, 页码 4-16

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.03.016

关键词

Anterior temporal; fMRI; Semantic; Reading; MVPA; Orthographic; Spoken

资金

  1. FWO [G0660.09]
  2. KU Leuven [OT/08/56, OT/12/097]
  3. Federaal Wetenschapsbeleid Belspo Inter-University Inter-University Attraction Pole Grants [P6/29, P7/11]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Left perirhinal cortex has been previously implicated in associative coding. According to a recent experiment, the similarity of perirhinal fMRI response patterns to written concrete words is higher for words which are more similar in their meaning. If left perirhinal cortex functions as an amodal semantic hub, one would predict that this semantic similarity effect would extend to the spoken modality. We conducted an event-related fMRI experiment and evaluated whether a same semantic similarity effect could be obtained for spoken as for written words. Twenty healthy subjects performed a property verification task in either the written or the spoken modality. Words corresponded to concrete animate entities for which extensive feature generation was available from more than 1000 subjects. From these feature generation data, a concept-feature matrix was derived which formed the basis of a cosine similarity matrix between the entities reflecting their similarity in meaning (called the semantic cossimilarity matrix). Independently, we calculated a cosine similarity matrix between the left perirhinal fMRI activity patterns evoked by the words (called the fMRI cossimilarity matrix). Next, the similarity was determined between the semantic cossimilarity matrix and the fMRI cossimilarity matrix. This was done for written and spoken words pooled, for written words only, for spoken words only, as well as for crossmodal pairs. Only for written words did the fMRI cossimilarity matrix correlate with the semantic cossimilarity matrix. Contrary to our prediction, we did not find any such effect for auditory word input nor did we find cross-modal effects in perirhinal cortex between written and auditory words. Our findings situate the contribution of left perirhinal cortex to word processing at the top of the visual processing pathway, rather than at an amodal stage where visual and auditory word processing pathways have already converged. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据