4.5 Article

Gene-environment interplay between peer rejection and depressive behavior in children

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY
卷 50, 期 8, 页码 1009-1017

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2009.02052.x

关键词

Gene-environment interaction; gene-environment correlation; depressive behavior; peer rejection; childhood; twins; behavioral genetics

资金

  1. Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
  2. Fonds Concerte pour l'Aide la Recherche
  3. Fonds Quebecois de la Recherche sur la Societe et la Culture
  4. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  5. Fonds de Recherche en Sante du Quebec

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Genetic risk for depressive behavior may increase the likelihood of exposure to environmental stressors (gene-environment correlation, rGE). By the same token, exposure to environmental stressors may moderate the effect of genes on depressive behavior (gene-environment interaction, GxE). Relating these processes to a peer-related stressor in childhood, the present study examined (1) whether genetic risk for depressive behavior in children is related to higher levels of rejection by the peer group (rGE) and (2) whether peer rejection moderates the effect of genetic factors on children's depressive behavior (GxE). Methods: The sample comprised 336 twin pairs (MZ pairs = 196, same-sex DZ pairs = 140) assessed in kindergarten (mean age 72.7 months). Peer acceptance/rejection was measured via peer nominations. Depressive behavior was measured through teacher ratings. Results: Consistent with rGE, a moderate overlap of genetic effects was found between peer acceptance/rejection and depressive behavior. In line with GxE, genetic effects on depressive behavior varied across levels of peer acceptance/rejection. Conclusions: An increased genetic disposition for depressive behavior is related to a higher risk of peer rejection (rGE). However, genes play a lesser role in explaining individual differences in depressive behavior in rejected children than in accepted children (GxE).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据