4.5 Article

Accurate heat capacity measurements on powdered samples using a Quantum Design physical property measurement system

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THERMODYNAMICS
卷 42, 期 9, 页码 1107-1115

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jct.2010.04.008

关键词

Heat capacity; PPMS; Powdered samples; Calorimeters

资金

  1. Department of Energy (USA) [DE-FG02-05ER15666]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-FG02-05ER15666] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have evaluated the accuracy of the heat capacity option of a Quantum Design physical property measurement system (PPMS) by measuring the heat capacity of various types of conducting and insulating samples over the temperature range from (2 to 300) K. In particular, the accuracy of measurements on a copper pellet was determined to be +/-2% for 2 K < T < 20K and +/-0.6% for 20K < T < 300 K, however similar measurements on a powdered sample of benzoic acid had errors as high as 20%. A new method for heat capacity measurements of powdered samples using a PPMS system has been developed that allows us to obtain heat capacity measurements for both insulating and conducting powdered samples with an accuracy of +/-1% from (20 to 300) K and +/-2% to +/-5% for T < 20K. Since the heat capacity of substances (and corresponding entropy contribution) is small at low temperatures for lattice-only contributions, the accuracy of +/-2% to +/-5% below 20 K is considered acceptable. As a test of the new method, the heat capacity of powdered bulk hematite has been measured in the temperature range from (2 to 300) K with the PPMS, and its standard entropy at T = 298.15 K was calculated to be (87.33 and 87.27) J . K-1 mol(-1), which deviates -0.08% and -0.15% from the accepted reference value, respectively. We recommend that this new method become the standard for accurate heat capacity measurements on insulating powdered samples using a PPMS system and the corresponding thermodynamic calculations. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据