4.7 Article

Quantum Trajectory-Electronic Structure Approach for Exploring Nuclear Effects in the Dynamics of Nanomaterials

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THEORY AND COMPUTATION
卷 9, 期 12, 页码 5221-5235

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ct4006147

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [CHE-1056188, ARRA-NSF-EPS-0919436, CHE-1048629]
  2. Center for Nanophase Materials Sciences
  3. Scientific User Facilities Division, office of Basic Energy Sciences, U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)
  4. Mathematical Multifaceted Integrated Centers within the Applied Mathematics activity of the U.S. DOE Advanced Scientific Computing Research program
  5. American Chemical Society
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  7. Division Of Chemistry [1056188, 1048629] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A massively parallel, direct quantum molecular dynamics method is described. The method combines a quantum trajectory (QT) representation of the nuclear wave function discretized into an ensemble of trajectories with an electronic structure (ES) description of electrons, namely using the density functional tight binding (DFTB) theory. Quantum nuclear effects are included into the dynamics of the nuclei via quantum corrections to the classical forces. To reduce computational cost and increase numerical accuracy, the quantum corrections to dynamics resulting from localization of the nuclear wave function are computed approximately and included into selected degrees of freedom representing light particles where the quantum effects are expected to be the most pronounced. A massively parallel implementation, based on the message passing interface allows for efficient simulations of ensembles of thousands of trajectories at once. The QTES-DFTB dynamics approach is employed to study the role of quantum nuclear effects on the interaction of hydrogen with a model graphene sheet, revealing that neglect of nuclear effects can lead to an overestimation of adsorption.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据