4.7 Article

Conical Intersection and Potential Energy Surface Features of a Model Retinal Chromophore: Comparison of EOM-CC and Multireference Methods

期刊

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ct300759z

关键词

-

资金

  1. Bowling Green State University
  2. Center for Photochemical Sciences of Bowling Green State University
  3. National Science Foundation [CHE-1152070, CHE-0951634]
  4. Humboldt Research Foundation
  5. Dornsife College of Letters, Arts, and Sciences
  6. WISE program (USC)
  7. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  8. Division Of Chemistry [1152070] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  9. Division Of Chemistry
  10. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [0951634] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work investigates the performance of equation-of-motion coupled-cluster (EOM-CC) methods for describing the changes in the potential energy surfaces of the penta-2,4-dieniminium cation, a reduced model of the retinal chromophore of visual pigments, due to dynamical electron correlation effects. The ground-state wave function of this model includes charge-transfer and diradical configurations whose weights vary along different displacements and are rapidly changing at the conical intersection between the ground and the first excited states, making the shape of the potential energy surface sensitive to a balanced description of nondynamical and dynamical correlation. Recently, variational (MRCISD) and perturbative (MRPT2) approaches for including dynamical correlation in CASSCF-based calculations were tested along three representative ground state paths. Here, we use the same three paths to compare the performance of single-reference EOM-CC methods against MRCISD and MRCISD+Q We find that the spin-flip variant of EOM-CCSD with perturbative inclusion of triple excitations (dT or IT) produces potential energy profiles of the two lowest electronic states in quantitative agreement with MRCISD+Q (our highest-quality reference method). The nonparallelity errors and differences in vertical energy differences of the two surfaces along these scans are less than 1.4 kcal/mol (EOM-SF-CCSD(dT) versus MRCISD+Q). For comparison, the largest error of MRCISD versus MRCISD+Q is 1.7 kcal/mol. Our results show that the EOM-CC methods provide an alternative to multireference approaches and may be used to study photochemical systems like the one used in this work.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据