4.7 Article

Coarse-Grained Potential Model for Structural Prediction of Confined Water

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THEORY AND COMPUTATION
卷 8, 期 5, 页码 1828-1840

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ct200842c

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF [0328162, 0852657, 0915718]
  2. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr
  3. Division of Computing and Communication Foundations [0915718] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  4. Directorate For Engineering
  5. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn [0328162] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys
  7. Directorate For Engineering [0852657] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We propose a coarse-grained potential model to predict the concentration and potential profiles of confined water. In this model, we represent one water molecule with one coarse-grained bead, such that the interactions between the coarse-grained beads are given by isotropic two-body potentials. Due to the inherent inhomogeneity of the confined water microstructure, we find that a single spatially uniform coarse-grained water water potential may not be sufficient to accurately predict the structure of water near the surface. To accurately capture surface effects on the water structure, we add a coarse-grained correction potential between wall atoms and water coarse-grained beads. We use an empirical potential-based quasi-continuum theory (EQT) (J. Chem. Phys. 2007, 127, 174701) to derive and evaluate optimal parameters for the coarse-grained potential model. We evaluate the ability of our model to predict the structure of confined water for two different types of surfaces a silicon slit channel and a graphite slit channel and show that the results predicted by EQT are in good agreement with all-atom molecular dynamics results across multiple length scales. We also demonstrate that the coarse-grained potential parameters optimized using EQT work well even in the coarse-grained molecular dynamics simulations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据