4.7 Review

Benchmarks for Electronically Excited States: A Comparison of Noniterative and Iterative Triples Corrections in Linear Response Coupled Cluster Methods: CCSDR(3) versus CC3

期刊

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ct800256j

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SFB 663, project C4]
  2. Danish Center for Scientific Computing, FNU
  3. Carlsberg Foundation (SPAS)
  4. Deutscher Akademischer Austausch Dienst

向作者/读者索取更多资源

CCSDR(3) calculations of vertical excitation energies are reported for a set of 24 molecules and 121 excited valence singlet states from a recently published benchmark of organic molecules. The same geometries (MP2/6-31G*) and basis set (TZVP) were employed as in our previous linear response CC2, CCSD, and CC3 calculations. The CCSDR(3) results are compared against the CCSD and CC3 results. Statistical evaluation of all CCSDR(3) excitation energies gives mean absolute deviations of 0.09 eV from CC3 and 0.30 eV from CCSD. For excited states, which are dominated by single excitations, the absolute mean deviation from CC3 is reduced to 0.02 eV and the maximum deviation is 0.09 eV. CCSDR(3) is thus a very cost-effective accurate alternative to CC3.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据