4.7 Article

First-principles study for stability and binding mechanism of graphene/Ni(111) interface: Role of vdW interaction

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 141, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/1.4890728

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11004018]
  2. Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [10JJ4002]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi Province [2013GXNSFBA019007]
  4. construct program of the key discipline in Hunan province
  5. aid program for Science and Technology Innovative Research Team in Higher Educational Institutions of Hunan Province

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The interaction between graphene and Ni(111) surface has been investigated systematically by density functional theory calculations, in which two different functionals PBE and optB88-vdW are used. PBE calculation indicates no binding between graphene and Ni(111) surface, while optB88-vdW, which is evidenced to consider van der Waals interaction reasonably, predicts the correct binding picture. The accurate potential energy surfaces suggest that top-fcc, bridge-top, and top-hcp are possible stable structures of graphene on Ni(111) surface, which are also found to have very close energies, in agreement with coexistence of different phases found experimentally. Different from PBE, the optB88-vdW functional predicts that top-fcc is the most stable configuration, following by bridge-top and then top-hcp, which is consistent with the surface distribution given by a statistical analysis of high-resolution scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) images. The Dirac points are destroyed in chemisorbed phases of all stable structures. Further analysis indicates that strong hybridization between Ni-3d and C-2p orbitals and asymmetry induced by substrate are responsible for the gap opening at K point. The detailed binding mechanisms have been analysed using differential charge density and the STM images. (C) 2014 AIP Publishing LLC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据