4.7 Article

Electron correlation effects on the first hyperpolarizability of push-pull π-conjugated systems

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 134, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/1.3549814

关键词

-

资金

  1. F.R.S.-FRFC [2.4.617.07.F]
  2. FUNDP

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The first hyperpolarizability (beta) of representative push-pull pi-conjugated compounds has been calculated at several levels of approximation to assess the effects of electron correlation. First, the 6-31+G(d) basis set has been shown to give the best balance between accuracy and computational resources for a polyene linker whereas for polyyne linker, the 6-31G(d) basis set is already an optimal choice. As a result of cancellations between higher order contributions, the MP2 method turns out to be the method of choice to predict beta of push-pull pi-conjugated systems since it closely reproduces the values obtained with the reference CCSD(T) scheme. Moreover, the SDQ-MP4 and CCSD approaches provide rarely improved estimates over MP2 while the MP4 method does not represent an improvement over MP4-SDQ or the SCS-MP2 method, over MP2. Among density functional theory exchange-correlation functionals, LC-BLYP is reliable when characterizing the changes of first hyperpolarizability upon enlarging the pi-conjugated linker or upon changing the polyyne linker into a polyene segment. Nevertheless, its reliability is very similar to what can be achieved with the Hartree-Fock method and the MP2 scheme is by far more accurate. On the other hand, the BLYP, B3LYP, and BHandHLYP functionals perform quantitatively better in a number of cases but the trends are poorly described. This is also the case of the B2-PLYP and mPW2-PLYP functionals, which are often the most accurate, though they underestimate the increase of beta when going from polyyne to polyene linkers and overestimate the enhancement of beta with chain length. (C) 2011 American Institute of Physics. [doi:10.1063/1.3549814]

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据