4.7 Review

Perturbative triples corrections in state-specific multireference coupled cluster theory

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 132, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.3305335

关键词

coupled cluster calculations; perturbation theory; potential energy surfaces; wave functions

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  2. Fonds der Chemischen Industrie
  3. U.S. National Science Foundation [CHE-0749868]
  4. Division Of Chemistry
  5. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [749868] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We formulated and implemented a perturbative triples correction for the state-specific multireference coupled cluster approach with singles and doubles suggested by Mukherjee and co-workers, Mk-MRCCSD [Mol. Phys. 94, 157 (1998)]. Our derivation of the energy correction [Mk-MRCCSD(T)] is based on a constrained search for stationary points of the Mk-MRCC energy functional together with a perturbative expansion with respect to the appearing triples cluster operator. The Lambda-Mk-MRCCSD(T) approach derived in this way consists in (1) a correction to the off-diagonal matrix elements of the effective Hamiltonian which is unique to coupled cluster methods based on the Jeziorski-Monkhorst ansatz, and (2) an asymmetric energy correction to the diagonal elements of the effective Hamiltonian. The Mk-MRCCSD(T) correction is obtained from the Lambda-Mk-MRCCSD(T) method by approximating the singles and doubles Lagrange multipliers with the corresponding cluster amplitudes. We investigate the performance of the Mk-MRCCSD(T) method by applying it to the potential energy curve of the BeH2 model and F-2 and the geometry and harmonic vibrational frequencies of ozone. Computation of the energy difference between the mono- and bicyclic forms of the 2,6-pyridyne diradical illustrates the potential of Mk-MRCCSD(T) as a tool for the study of realistic chemical problems requiring multireference zeroth-order wave functions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据