4.7 Article

Obtaining Hartree-Fock and density functional theory doubly excited states with Car-Parrinello density matrix search

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 131, 期 20, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.3266564

关键词

density functional theory; excited states; helium compounds; HF calculations; hydrogen neutral molecules; lithium compounds; molecule-electron collisions; organic compounds; positive ions; wave functions

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [CHE-CAREER 0844999, PHY-CDI-0835546]
  2. University of Washington
  3. Division Of Chemistry
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [844999] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Division Of Physics
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [835543] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The calculation of doubly excited states is one of the major problems plaguing the modern day excited state workhorse methodology of linear response time dependent Hartree-Fock (TDHF) and density function theory (TDDFT). We have previously shown that the use of a resonantly tuned field within real-time TDHF and TDDFT is able to simultaneously excite both the alpha and beta electrons to achieve the two-electron excited states of minimal basis H-2 and HeH+ [C. M. Isborn and X. Li, J. Chem. Phys. 129, 204107 (2008)]. We now extend this method to many electron systems with the use of our Car-Parrinello density matrix search (CP-DMS) with a first-principles fictitious mass method for wave function optimization [X. Li, C. L. Moss, W. Liang, and Y. Feng, J. Chem. Phys. 130, 234115 (2009)]. Real-time TDHF/TDDFT is used during the application of the laser field perturbation, driving the electron density toward the doubly excited state. The CP-DMS method then converges the density to the nearest stationary state. We present these stationary state doubly excited state energies and properties at the HF and DFT levels for H-2, HeH+, lithium hydride, ethylene, and butadiene.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据