4.7 Article

Triptan-induced disruption of trigemino-cortical connectivity

期刊

NEUROLOGY
卷 84, 期 21, 页码 2124-2131

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000001610

关键词

-

资金

  1. German Research Foundation, DFG [1862/12-1]
  2. 7th Framework EU-Project EuroHeadPain [602633]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective:The 5-HT1B/D agonists (triptans) are specific headache medications that have no effect on pain as such. Although they are routinely used in the treatment of acute migraine attacks, the underlying mechanisms of action are still a matter of debate.Methods:Forty-three healthy participants underwent fMRI while receiving trigemino-nociceptive stimulation and control stimuli in a standardized fMRI paradigm. Using a crossover, double-blind, placebo-controlled design, 21 participants (10 women, mean age 26.9, range 20-37 years) received sumatriptan and 22 participants (11 women, mean age 25.5, range 22-32 years) received acetylsalicylic acid (ASA). Administration of medication and saline was randomized between participants of each group resulting in half of the participants receiving saline and the other half receiving the respective medication during the first fMRI data acquisition.Results:While mean pain intensity ratings did not differ significantly between control and medication nor between medications, we found a significant blood oxygen level-dependent signal increase in the trigeminal nuclei and the thalamus after sumatriptan treatment compared with placebo or ASA. In addition, we specifically looked for the pharmacologic modulation of functional coupling between trigeminal nuclei and higher brain areas, i.e., trigemino-cortical pathways, and found a strong coupling during the saline condition, which was altered by sumatriptan but not after ASA administration.Conclusion:These data suggest that a specific functional inhibition of trigemino-cortical projections is one of the reasons that triptans, unlike pain killers, act highly specifically on headache and migraine but not pain as such.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据