4.2 Article

Thickness Reduction of the Zeolitic Imidazolate Framework-8 Membrane by Controlling the Reaction Rate during the Membrane Preparation

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING OF JAPAN
卷 47, 期 10, 页码 770-776

出版社

SOC CHEMICAL ENG JAPAN
DOI: 10.1252/jcej.14we340

关键词

Gas Separation Membrane; Propylene/Propane Separation; Zeolitic Imidazolate Framework-8; Counter-Di Diffusion; Diffusive Separation

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [25820385]
  2. Cooperative Research Program of Network Joint Research Center for Materials and Devices
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25820385] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The layer thickness of a zeolitic imidazolate framework-8 (ZIF-8) membrane was successfully reduced in order to obtain high permeance of propylene. The ZIF-8 membranes for propylene/propane separation were prepared using a counter-diffusion method by changing the solution concentration and the molar ratio of 2-methylimidazole to zinc ion (Hmim/Zn2+). ZIF-8 layers with different thicknesses were formed in the outermost regions of porous alpha-alumina capillary substrates, and the minimum thickness of the ZIF-8 layer was 5 mu m. Single-component gas permeation properties were measured using propylene and propane at a temperature of 298 K, and the permeability, diffusivity, and solubility were analyzed. The maximum propylene/propane permselectivity of 135, diffusivity selectivity of 125, and solubility selectivity of 1.1 were obtained at a Hmim/Zn2+ ratio of 1 with a propylene permeance of 1.1 x 10 x(-9) mol . m(-2) . s(-1) . Pa-1. By contrast, a propylene/propane permselectivity of 113 with a propylene permeance of 3.3 x 10(-9) mol . m(-2) . s(-1) . Pa-1 was obtained at a Hmim/Zn2+ ratio of 0.33. The thickness of the ZIF-8 layer, the permselectivity of propylene/propane, and the permeance of propylene were controlled by regulating the concentration and the Hmim/Zn2+ ratio for the synthesis of the ZIF-8 membrane by the counter-diffusion method.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据