4.7 Article

Downregulation of AC061961.2, LING01-AS1, and RP11-13E1.5 is associated with dilated cardiomyopathy progression

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR PHYSIOLOGY
卷 234, 期 4, 页码 4460-4471

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcp.27247

关键词

differentially expressed gene (DEGs); dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM); long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs); weighted gene coexpression network analysis (WGCNA)

资金

  1. Jiangsu Top Expert Program in Six Professions [2014-WSW-052]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81270192]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to explore long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) implicated in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). Ten samples of failing hearts collected from the left ventricles of patients withDCM undergoing heart transplants, and ten control samples obtained from normal heart donors were included in this study. After sequencing, differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and lncRNAs between DCM and controls were screened, followed with functional enrichment analysis and weighted gene coexpression network analysis (WGCNA). Five key lncNRAs were validated through real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Total 1,398 DEGs were identified, including 267 lncRNAs. WGCNA identified seven modules that were significantly correlated with DCM. The top 50 genes in the three modules (black, dark-green, and green-yellow) were significantly correlated with DCM disease state. Four core enrichment lncRNAs, such as AC061961.2, LING01-AS1, and RP11-557H15.4, in the green-yellow module were associated with neurotransmitter secretion. Five core enrichment lncRNAs, such as KB-1299A7.2 and RP11-13E1.5, in the black module were associated with the functions of blood circulation and heart contraction. AC061961.2, LING01-AS1, and RP11-13E1.5 were confirmed to be downregulated in DCM tissues by real-time PCR. The current study suggests that downregulation of AC061961.2, LING01-AS1, and RP11-13E1.5 may be associated with DCM progression, which may serve as key diagnostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets for DCM.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据