4.7 Article

Effect of Cryopreservation on Biological and Immunological Properties of Stem Cells From Apical Papilla

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR PHYSIOLOGY
卷 223, 期 2, 页码 415-422

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/jcp.22050

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2007CB947304, 2010CB944801]
  2. Academic Human Resources Development in the Institutions of Higher Learning [PHR20090510]
  3. Beijing Major Scientific Program [D0906007000091, PXM 2009-014226-074691, PXM 2009-014226-073517]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30428009, 30700941]
  5. Beijing New Star Program [2007B067]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Stem cells from apical papilla (SCAP) are a novel population of multipotent stem cells that, although similar to dental pulp stem cells, are a discrete source of dental stem cells. SCAP have potential roles in root development, apexogenesis, pulp/dentin regeneration, and bioroot engineering. However, procedures to store and preserve SCAP for future clinical applications have not been explored. In this study, we compared human freshly isolated SCAP (fSCAP) with cryopreserved SCAP (cSCAP) in terms of cell viability, colony-forming efficiency, cell proliferation rate, multilineage differentiation potential, profiles of mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) markers, karyotype analysis, and immunological assays. cSCAP showed a similar viable cell ratio, colony-forming efficiency, cell proliferation rate, multilineage differentiation potential, MSC surface markers, apoptotic rate, and G-banded karyotype when compared to fSCAP. There was no significant difference between fSCAP and cSCAP with regard to immune properties. In addition, cSCAP of miniature pig possessed the similar proliferation rate, differentiation potential, and immunomodulatory function as seen in fSCAP. This study demonstrates that cryopreservation does not affect the biological and immunological properties of SCAP, supporting the feasibility of SCAP cryopreservation in nitrogen. J. Cell. Physiol. 223: 415-422, 2010. (C) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据