4.7 Article

Caffeic Acid Phenethyl Ester, an Active Component of Honeybee Propolis Attenuates Osteoclastogenesis and Bone Resorption Via the Suppression of RANKL-Induced NF-κB and NFAT Activity

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR PHYSIOLOGY
卷 221, 期 3, 页码 642-649

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcp.21898

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia
  2. Arthritis Foundation of Western Australia
  3. Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital (Perth, Western Australia) Research Fund
  4. University of Western Australia
  5. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC)/Osteoporosis Australia Scholarship
  6. NHMRC (C.J. Martin) Overseas Biomedical Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Receptor activator NF-kappa B ligand (RANKL)-activated signaling is essential for osteoclast differentiation, activation and survival. Caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE), a natural NF-kappa B inhibitor from honeybee propolis has been shown to have anti-tumor and anti-inflammatory properties. In this study, we investigated the effect of CAPE on the regulation of RANKL-induced osteoclastogenesis, bone resorption and signaling pathways. Low concentrations of CAPE (< 1 mu M) dose dependently inhibited RANKL-induced osteoclastogenesis in RAW264.7 cell and bone marrow macrophage (BMM) cultures, as well as decreasing the capacity of human osteoclasts to resorb bone. CAPE inhibited both constitutive and RANKL-induced NF-kappa B and NFAT activation, concomitant with delayed I kappa B alpha degradation and inhibition of p65 nuclear translocation. At higher concentrations, CAPE induced apoptosis and caspase 3 activities of RAW264.7 and disrupts the microtubule network in osteoclast like (OCL) cells. Taken together, our findings demonstrate that inhibition of NF-kappa B and NFAT activation by CAPE results in the attenuation of osteoclastogenesis and bone resorption, implying that CAPE is a potential treatment for osteolytic bone diseases. J. Cell. Physiol. 221: 642-649, 2009. (C) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据