4.7 Article

H3K9 Acetylation and Radial Chromatin Positioning

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR PHYSIOLOGY
卷 220, 期 1, 页码 91-101

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcp.21734

关键词

-

资金

  1. Academy of Sciences of Czech Republic [AVOZ50040507, IQS500040508, IAA5004306]
  2. Grant Agency of the Czech Republic [204/06/0978, 310/07/P480]
  3. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic [LC06027, LC535]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Histone variants and their epigenetic modifications determine genome function, particularly transcription. However, whether regulation of gene expression can be influenced by nuclear organization or vice versa is not completely clear. Here, we analyzed the effect of epigenetic changes induced by a histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACi) on the nuclear radial rearrangement of select genomic regions and chromosomes. The HDACi, sodium butyrate (NaBt), induced differentiation of human adenocarcinoma HT29 cells as well as a genome-wide increase in H3K9 acetylation. Three-dimensional analysis of nuclear radial distributions revealed that this increase in H3K9 acetylation was often associated with a repositioning of select loci and chromosomes toward the nuclear center. On the other hand, many centromeres resided sites more toward the nuclear periphery, similar to sites occupied by chromosome X. In more than two-thirds of events analyzed, central nuclear positioning correlated with a high level of H3K9 acetylation, while more peripheral positioning within interphase nuclei correlated with a lower level of acetylation. This was observed for the gene-rich chromosomes 17 and 19, TP53, and CCND / genes as well as for gene-poor chromosome 18, APC gene, regions of low transcriptional activity (anti-RIDGEs), and the relatively transcriptionally less active chromosome X. These results are consistent with a role for epigenetic histone modifications in governing the nuclear radial positioning of genomic regions during differentiation. J. Cell. Physiol. 220: 91-101, 2009. (C) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据