4.6 Article

Type 1 inositol-1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor is a late substrate of caspases during apoptosis

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 113, 期 8, 页码 2775-2784

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcb.24155

关键词

INOSITOL-1; 4; 5-TRISPHOSPHATE RECEPTOR; CALCIUM; APOPTOSIS; CASPASE; TEV PROTEASE

资金

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) [MOP-86563]
  2. Canadian Cancer Society (CCS) [MOP-86757]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Apoptosis is characterized by the proteolytic cleavage of hundreds of proteins. One of them, the type 1 inositol-1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor (IP3R-1), a multimeric receptor located on the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane that is critical to calcium homeostasis, was reported to be cleaved during staurosporine (STS) induced-apoptosis in Jurkat cells. Because the reported cleavage site separates the IP3 binding site from the channel moiety, its cleavage would shut down a critical signaling pathway that is common to several cellular processes. Here we show that IP3R-1 is not cleaved in 293 cells treated with STS, TNFa, Trail, or ultra-violet (UV) irradiation. Further, it is not cleaved in Hela or Jurkat cells induced to undergo apoptosis with Trail, TNFa, or UV. In accordance with previous reports, we demonstrate that it is cleaved in a Jurkat cell line treated with STS. However its cleavage occurs only after poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP), which cleavage is a hallmark of apoptosis, and p23, a poor caspase-7 substrate, are completely cleaved, suggesting that IP3R-1 is a relatively late substrate of caspases. Nevertheless, the receptor is fully accessible to proteolysis in cellulo by ectopically overexpressed caspase-7 or by the tobacco etch virus (TEV) protease. Finally, using recombinant caspase-3 and microsomal fractions enriched in IP3R-1, we show that the receptor is a poor caspase-3 substrate. Consequently, we conclude that IP3R-1 is not a key death substrate. J. Cell. Biochem. 113: 27752784, 2012. (c) 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据