4.6 Article

Transcriptional and Post-Transcriptional Control of DNA Methyltransferase 3B Is Regulated by Phosphatidylinositol 3 Kinase/Akt Pathway in Human Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cell Lines

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 111, 期 1, 页码 158-167

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcb.22684

关键词

DNA METHYLTRANSFERASE (DNMT); PI3K/Akt; HUMAN HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA

资金

  1. Shanghai Leading Academic Discipline Project [B110]
  2. National Key Set-Tech Special Project of China [2008ZX10002-018, 2008ZX10002-019]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs) are essential for maintenance of aberrant methylation in cancer cells and play important roles in the development of cancers Unregulated activation of PI3K/Akt pathway is a prominent feature of many human cancers including human hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In present study, we found that DNMT3B mRNA and protein levels were decreased in a dose- and time-dependent manner in HCC cell lines with LY294002 treatment. However, we detected that LY294002 treatment did not induce increase of the degradation of DNMT3B protein using protein decay assay Moreover we found that Akt induced alteration of the expression of DNMT3B in cells transfected with myristylated variants of Akt2 or cells transfected with small interfering RNA respectively Based on DNMT3B promoter dual-luciferase reporter assay, we found PI3K pathway regulates DNMT3B expression at transcriptional level And DNMT3B mRNA decay analysis suggested that down-regulation of DNMT3B by LY294002 is also post-transcriptional control. Furthermore, we demonstrated that LY294002 down-regulated HuR expression in a time-dependent manner in BEL-7404 In summary, we have, for the first time, demonstrate that PI3K/Akt pathway regulates the expression of DNIVIT313 at transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels, which is particularly important to understand the effects of PI3K/Akt and DNMT3B on hepatocarcmogenesis. J. Cell Biochem. 111: 158-167, 2010. (C) 2010 Wiley-Liss. Inc

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据