4.6 Article

Xanthohumol inhibits inflammatory factor production and angiogenesis in breast cancer xenografts

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 104, 期 5, 页码 1699-1707

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcb.21738

关键词

angiogenesis; breast cancer; diet; inflammation; polyphenols; xanthohumol

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Xanthohumol (XN), a natural polyphenol present in beer, is known to exert anti-cancer effects. However, its precise mechanisms are not yet clearly defined. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of oral administration of XN in breast cancer xenografts in nude mice. Proliferation and apoptosis were first examined in MCF7 cell Cultures after incubation with XN by trypan blue exclusion assay, [H-3]-thymidine incorporation, K167 immunostaining and TUNEL. Morphological and histological characteristics Of tumours from XN-treated or control (vehicle-treated) mice were compared. immunohistochemistry for proliferative, inflammatory and endothelial cell markers was performed and activation of nuclear factor kappa B (NF kappa B) pathway was assessed by ELISA. In vitro MCF7 cell proliferation decreased in a dose-dependent manner. Oral administration of XN to nude mice inoculated with MCF7 cells resulted in central necrosis within tumours, reduced inflammatory cell number, focal proliferation areas, increased percentage of apoptotic cells and decreased microvessel density. Anti-angiogenic effects of XN were further confirmed by immunoblotting for factor VIII expression in XN-treated tumors as compared to controls. Decreased immunostaining for NF kappa B, phosphorylated-inhibitor of kappa B and interleukin-1 beta were also observed as well as a significant decrease in NF kappa B activity to 60% of control values. These novel findings indicate that XN is able to target both breast cancer and host cells, namely inflammatory and endothelial cells, Suggesting its potential use as a double-edge anti-cancer agent. J. Cell. Biochem. 104: 1699-1707, 2008. (C) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据