4.5 Article

The ginsenoside metabolite compound K, a novel agonist of glucocorticoid receptor, induces tolerance to endotoxin-induced lethal shock

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR MEDICINE
卷 12, 期 5A, 页码 1739-1753

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2007.00181.x

关键词

compound K; Toll-like receptor 4; LPS; endotoxaemia; glucocorticoid receptor

资金

  1. Korea Science & Engineering Foundation [R13-2007-020-01000-0]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Compound K (C-K), a protopanaxadiol ginsenoside metabolite, was previously shown to have immunomodulatory effects. Here, we describe a novel therapeutic role for C-K in the treatment of lethal sepsis through the modulation of Toll-like receptor (TLR) 4-associated signalling via glucocorticoid receptor (GR) binding. In mononuclear phagocytes, C-K significantly repressed the activation of TLR4/lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced NF-kappa B and mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs), as well as the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines. However C-K did not affect the TLR3-mediated expression of interferon-beta or the nuclear translocation of IRF-3. C-K competed with the synthetic glucocorticoid dexamethasone for binding to GR and activated glucocorticoid responsive element (GRE)-containing reporter plasmids in a dose-dependent manner. In addition, the blockade of GR with either the GR antagonist RU486 or a siRNA against GR substantially reversed the anti-inflammatory effects of C-K. Furthermore, TLR4-dependent repression of inflammatory response genes by C-K was mediated through the disruption of p65/interferon regulatory factor complexes. Importantly, pre- or post-treatment with C-K significantly rescued mice from Gram-negative bacterial LPS-induced lethal shock by lowering their systemic inflammatory cytokine levels and by reversing the lethal sequelae of sepsis. Collectively, these results demonstrate that C-K, as a functional ligand of GR, regulates distinct TLR4-mediated inflammatory responses, and suggest a novel therapy for Gram-negative septic shock.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据