4.5 Article

NF-κB controls axonal regeneration and degeneration through cell-specific balance of RelA and p50 in the adult CNS

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELL SCIENCE
卷 127, 期 14, 页码 3052-3065

出版社

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jcs.140731

关键词

Anaphase-promoting complex; Axonal regeneration; Cdh1; Manganese-enhanced MRI; NF-kappa B; p50; RelA; p65; Wallerian degeneration

资金

  1. VELUX Foundation (Switzerland) [806]
  2. Interdisziplinares Zentrum fur Klinische Forschung (IZKF), Jena
  3. Oppenheim-Foundation/Novartis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

NF-kappa B is dually involved in neurogenesis and brain pathology. Here, we addressed its role in adult axoneogenesis by generating mutations of RelA (p65) and p50 (also known as NFKB1) heterodimers of canonical NF-kappa B. In addition to RelA activation in astrocytes, optic nerve axonotmesis caused a hitherto unrecognized induction of RelA in growth-inhibitory oligodendrocytes. Intraretinally, RelA was induced in severed retinal ganglion cells and was also expressed in bystander Muller glia. Cell-type-specific deletion of transactivating RelA in neurons and/or macroglia stimulated axonal regeneration in a distinct and synergistic pattern. By contrast, deletion of the p50 suppressor subunit promoted spontaneous and post-injury Wallerian degeneration. Growth effects mediated by RelA deletion paralleled a downregulation of growth-inhibitory Cdh1 (officially known as FZR1) and upregulation of the endogenous Cdh1 suppressor EMI1 (officially known as FBXO5). Pro-degenerative loss of p50, however, stabilized retinal Cdh1. In vitro, RelA deletion elicited opposing pro-regenerative shifts in active nuclear and inactive cytoplasmic moieties of Cdh1 and Id2. The involvement of NF-kappa B and cell-cycle regulators such as Cdh1 in regenerative processes of non-replicative neurons suggests novel mechanisms by which molecular reprogramming might be executed to stimulate adult axoneogenesis and treat central nervous system (CNS) axonopathies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据