4.5 Article

Reversible thiol oxidation in the H2O2-dependent activation of the transcription factor Pap1

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELL SCIENCE
卷 126, 期 10, 页码 2279-2284

出版社

COMPANY OF BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jcs.124370

关键词

H2O2 sensor; Pap1; Disulphide bond; Redox cascade; Fission yeast

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [BFU2009-06933, BFU2012-32045]
  2. Spanish program Consolider-Ingenio [CSD 2007-0020]
  3. Generalitat de Catalunya (Spain) [SGR2009-196]
  4. Institucio Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avancats Academia Awards (Generalitat de Catalunya)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Reversible thiol oxidation is both a mark of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) toxicity and an initiator of signalling events. H2O2 sensors contain exposed and reactive cysteine residues, which become transiently oxidized as an activation mechanism. In fission yeast, the Pap1 (pombe (AP) under bar -1) transcription factor is normally cytosolic, and upon H2O2 stress it undergoes post-translational modifications impairing its nuclear export; genetic evidences suggested the formation of a disulphide bond in Pap1 as a triggering activation event. Nuclear Pap1 is then recruited to about 50-80 promoters and induces an adaptation response. We have now dissected the role of all seven cysteine residues in Pap1 using genetic and proteomic techniques, and we show that four of them are required for Pap1 to be activated by H2O2 stress. Thus, mutants lacking each one of these cysteine residues display sensitivity to peroxides. Furthermore, these mutant proteins do not become oxidized by H2O2 and cannot bind to promoters or trigger the Pap1-dependent gene expression program. We also demonstrate, by proteomic analysis of reduced and oxidized Pap1, that these four cysteine residues are reversibly oxidized upon H2O2 stress. Our study suggests that not just one but probably two disulphide bonds are required to promote the important conformational changes that trigger Pap1 activation and nuclear accumulation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据