4.7 Article

Theoretical and experimental evaluation of multi-band EPI for high-resolution whole brain pCASL Imaging

期刊

NEUROIMAGE
卷 106, 期 -, 页码 170-181

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.10.029

关键词

Arterial spin labeling (ASL); Cerebral blood flow (CBF); Leakage evaluation via acquired dummy slices (LEADS); Multi-band echo planar imaging (MB-EPI); Pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling (pCASL); Total leakage factor (TLF)

资金

  1. Human Connectome Project from the 16 Institutes [1U54 MH091657]
  2. Centers of the National Institutes of Health
  3. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health [UL1TR000114]
  4. [P41 RR008079]
  5. [P41 EB015894]
  6. [P30 NS076408]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Multi-band echo planar imaging (MB-EPI), a new approach to increase data acquisition efficiency and/or temporal resolution, has the potential to overcome critical limitations of standard acquisition strategies for obtaining high-resolution whole brain perfusion imaging using arterial spin labeling (ASL). However, the use of MB also introduces confounding effects, such as spatially varying amplified thermal noise and leakage contamination, which have not been evaluated to date as to their effect on cerebral blood flow (CBF) estimation. In this study, both the potential benefits and confounding effects of MB-EPI were systematically evaluated through both simulation and experimentally using a pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling (pCASL) strategy. These studies revealed that the amplified noise, given by the geometry factor (g-factor), and the leakage contamination, assessed by the total leakage factor (TLF), have a minimal impact on CBF estimation. Furthermore, it is demonstrated that MB-EPI greatly benefits high-resolution whole brain pCASL studies in terms of improved spatial and temporal signal-to-noise ratio efficiencies, and increases compliance with the assumptions of the commonly used single blood compartment model, resulting in improved CBF estimates. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据