4.5 Article

The human NKG2D ligand ULBP2 can be expressed at the cell surface with or without a GPI anchor and both forms can activate NK cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELL SCIENCE
卷 124, 期 3, 页码 321-327

出版社

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jcs.076042

关键词

GPI-anchored proteins; NKG2D; Innate immunity; Detergent-resistant membranes; ER trafficking

资金

  1. MRC
  2. FIS [PS09/00181, PI08/1701]
  3. Leukaemia Research Fund
  4. The Newton Trust
  5. Fundacion Caja Madrid
  6. Ibercaja
  7. MRC [G0601165, G9800943] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. Medical Research Council [G0601165, G9800943] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The activating immune receptor NKG2D binds to several stress-induced ligands that are structurally different. MHC-class-I-related chain (MIC) A/B molecules have a transmembrane domain, whereas most UL16 binding proteins (ULBPs) are glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-linked molecules. The significance of this variability in membrane anchors is unclear. Here, we demonstrate that ULBP2, but not ULBP1 or ULBP3, can reach the cell surface without the GPI modification. Several proteins are expressed at the cell surface as both transmembrane and GPI-linked molecules, either via alternative splicing or by the expression of linked genes. However, to our knowledge, ULBP2 is the first single mammalian cDNA that can be expressed as either a transmembrane or a GPI-anchored protein. The rate of maturation and the levels of cell surface expression of the non-GPI-linked form were lower than those of the GPI-linked ULBP2. Nonetheless, non-GPI ULBP2 was recognised by NKG2D and triggered NK cell cytotoxicity. These data show that differences in membrane attachment by NKG2D ligands are more important for regulation of their surface expression than for cytotoxic recognition by NKG2D and emphasise that detailed characterisation of the cell biology of individual NKG2D ligands will be necessary to allow targeted modulation of this system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据