4.5 Article

Pex11pβ-mediated growth and division of mammalian peroxisomes follows a maturation pathway

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELL SCIENCE
卷 123, 期 16, 页码 2750-2762

出版社

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jcs.062109

关键词

Peroxisomes; Organelle division; Peroxisome biogenesis; Pex11p

资金

  1. German Research Foundation (DFG) [SCHR 518/6-1, SCHR 518/6-2]
  2. Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) [REEQ/1023/BIO/2005, PTDC/BIA-BCM/71932/2006]
  3. University of Aveiro
  4. Bijzonder Onderzoeksfonds of the K. U. Leuven [OT/09/045]
  5. Fonds voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek - Vlaanderen [G.0754.09]
  6. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PTDC/BIA-BCM/71932/2006] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Peroxisomes are ubiquitous subcellular organelles, which multiply by growth and division but can also form de novo via the endoplasmic reticulum. Growth and division of peroxisomes in mammalian cells involves elongation, membrane constriction and final fission. Dynamin-like protein (DLP1/Drp1) and its membrane adaptor Fis1 function in the later stages of peroxisome division, whereas the membrane peroxin Pex11p beta appears to act early in the process. We have discovered that a Pex11p beta-YFPm fusion protein can be used as a specific tool to further dissect peroxisomal growth and division. Pex11p beta-YFPm inhibited peroxisomal segmentation and division, but resulted in the formation of pre-peroxisomal membrane structures composed of globular domains and tubular extensions. Peroxisomal matrix and membrane proteins were targeted to distinct regions of the peroxisomal structures. Pex11p beta-mediated membrane formation was initiated at pre-existing peroxisomes, indicating that growth and division follows a multistep maturation pathway and that formation of mammalian peroxisomes is more complex than simple division of a pre-existing organelle. The implications of these findings on the mechanisms of peroxisome formation and membrane deformation are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据