4.5 Article

Identification of β-catenin as a target of the intracellular tyrosine kinase PTK6

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELL SCIENCE
卷 123, 期 2, 页码 236-245

出版社

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jcs.053264

关键词

PTK6; BRK; Sik; beta-catenin; Tyrosine kinase; Intestine; Colon

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [DK44525, DK068503]
  2. AGA Foundation
  3. NRSA/NIH
  4. NIDDK [T32 DK07739]
  5. DOD [W81XWH-06-1-000]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Disruption of the gene encoding protein tyrosine kinase 6 (PTK6) leads to increased growth, impaired enterocyte differentiation and higher levels of nuclear beta-catenin in the mouse small intestine. Here, we demonstrate that PTK6 associates with nuclear and cytoplasmic beta-catenin and inhibits beta-catenin- and T-cell factor (TCF)-mediated transcription. PTK6 directly phosphorylates beta-catenin on Tyr64, Tyr142, Tyr331 and/or Tyr333, with the predominant site being Tyr64. However, mutation of these sites does not abrogate the ability of PTK6 to inhibit beta-catenin transcriptional activity. Outcomes of PTK6-mediated regulation appear to be dependent on its intracellular localization. In the SW620 colorectal adenocarcinoma cell line, nuclear-targeted PTK6 negatively regulates endogenous beta-catenin/TCF transcriptional activity, whereas membrane-targeted PTK6 enhances beta-catenin/TCF regulated transcription. Levels of TCF4 and the transcriptional co-repressor TLE/Groucho increase in SW620 cells expressing nuclear-targeted PTK6. Knockdown of PTK6 in SW620 cells leads to increased beta-catenin/TCF transcriptional activity and increased expression of beta-catenin/TCF target genes Myc and Survivin. Ptk6-null BAT-GAL mice, containing a Chi-catenin-activated LacZ reporter transgene, have increased levels of beta-galactosidase expression in the gastrointestinal tract. The ability of PTK6 to negatively regulate beta-catenin/TCF transcription by modulating levels of TCF4 and TLE/Groucho could contribute to its growth-inhibitory activities in vivo.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据