4.4 Article

Simvastatin Attenuated Cerebrovascular Cell Proliferation in the Development of Hypertension Through Rho/Rho-kinase Pathway

期刊

JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR PHARMACOLOGY
卷 59, 期 6, 页码 576-582

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/FJC.0b013e318250ba2c

关键词

hypertension; statins; remodeling; rho/rho kinase; endothelin-1; proliferation

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2009CB521903]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30730105]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The cerebrovascular remodeling is a prominent feature of hypertension and considered as a major risk of stroke. Statins may suppress the activation of the Rho/Rho-kinase pathway and have pleiotropic actions against the development of vascular remodeling. We hypothesized that the inhibition of the Rho/Rho-kinase pathway by simvastatin during hypertension could recuperate the pathological changes of basilar artery through the downregulation of cell proliferation. To resolve the problem, we used 2-kid, 2-clip rat as a hypertension model and evaluated the effect of simvastatin on the Rho/Rho-kinase pathway. In addition, we assessed the changes of the proliferation rate by CCK-8 assay in basilar artery smooth muscle cells. Our results from this study showed that a continuous increase in the plasma endothelin-1 (ET-1) concentration and the Rho/Rho-kinase activity was positively correlated with changes in blood pressure in the hypertensive rat. Simvastatin ameliorated the upregulated Rho/Rho-kinase activity and cell proliferation during hypertension. Moreover, simvastatin, the RhoA inhibitor C3, and the RhoA-kinase inhibitor Y27632 all attenuated the proliferation rate induced by ET-1 in basilar artery smooth muscle cells via the Rho/Rho-kinase signaling pathway. In conclusion, simvastatin attenuated ET-1-induced proliferation through the Rho/Rho-kinase signaling pathway in hypertensive rat basilar artery, and it may be an excellent reagent to protect vascular remodeling and stroke.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据