4.4 Article

A novel partial fatty acid oxidation inhibitor decreases myocardial oxygen consumption and improves cardiac efficiency in demand-induced ischemic heart

期刊

JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR PHARMACOLOGY
卷 51, 期 4, 页码 372-379

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/FJC.0b013e318166803b

关键词

fatty acid oxidation; CVT-4325; myocardial oxygen consumption; myocardial ischemia; cardiac efficiency

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The benefits of inhibition of fatty acid oxidation (FOX) and stimulation of glucose oxidation (GOX) in ischemia are controversial. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of the FOX inhibitor CVT-4325 on the rates of FOX, GOX, myocardial oxygen consumption (MVO2), and cardiac efficiency in the absence and presence of palmitate during demand-induced ischemia of the rodent isolated hearts. Palmitate concentration-dependently increased FOX, decreased GOX, and increased MVO2. CVT-4325 inhibited FOX and increased GOX in the presence (but not the absence) of 1.2 mM palmitate, with EC50 values of 0.9 and 5.8 mu M, respectively. The potency for CVT-4325 to inhibit FOX was 10-fold greater (0.9 versus 9.7 mu M) in the presence of 1.2 mM compared with 0.4 mM palmitate. The increase in MVO2 caused by 1.2 mM palmitate was significantly reduced by 3 to 10 mu M CVT-4325 in guinea pig hearts. In the presence of 1.2 mM palmitate, an increase in pacing rate of the guinea pig heart from 3.5 to 6.5 Hz caused a significant 50% increase in MVO2, a decrease in cardiac efficiency, and an increase in lactate concentration in the cardiac effluent from 0.04 +/- 0.01 to 0.10 +/- 0.02 mM (P < 0.01). CVT-4325 (3 mu M) attenuated the increase (P < 0.05) in MVO2 while maintaining cardiac contractility, and decreased the lactate production to 0.05 +/- 0.01 mM (P < 0.01). Thus, the FOX inhibitor CVT-4325 decreased MVO2 and increased myocardial efficiency during demand-(pacing)-induced ischemia in the presence of palmitate in the rodent isolated hearts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据