4.5 Article

Polymorphisms of Adrenoceptors are Not Associated With an Increased Risk of Adverse Event in Heart Failure: A MERIT-HF Substudy

期刊

JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE
卷 15, 期 5, 页码 435-441

出版社

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE INC MEDICAL PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2008.12.005

关键词

alpha(2C)-Adrenoceptor; beta(1)-adrenoceptor polymorphism; heart failure; events

资金

  1. Medical Research Council [G78/8276]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Enhanced sympathetic activation has a central role in the development of heart failure (HF). We assessed whether the alpha(2C)-adrenoceptor (Del322-325) polymorphism exclusively or in combination with a beta(1)-adrenoceptor (Arg389) polymorphism, each with known independent effects oil sympathetic function, were associated with an increased risk of adverse events in HF. Methods and Results: A total of 526 patients enrolled in the Metoprolol CR/XL Randomized Intervention Trial in Congestive Heart Failure study were genotyped for both adrenoceptor polymorphisms. The distribution of alpha(2C) genotypes was similar between the event and nonevent groups. However. a reduced prevalence of the Del322-325 allele was found in individuals with ischemic congestive HF (P = .022). Patients possessing both the alpha(2C) Del322-325 and beta(1) Arg389 alleles had no increased risk of events. Adjusting for confounding variables and the beta(1) Arg389Gly polymorphism, the odds ratio of being ins/del + del/del for the alpha(2C) Del322-325 and having an event was 0.89 with 95% CI 0.49-1.63, P = .715. Similarly, adjusting for confounding variables and the alpha(2C) Del322-325 polymorphism the odds ratio of being Arg/Arg or Arg/Gly for the beta(1) Arg389Gly polymorphism and having an event was 1.13 with 95% CI 0.52-2.17, P = .864. Conclusions: The alpha(2C) Del322-325 polymorphism exclusively or in combination with the beta(1)Arg389 allele is not associated with an increased risk of adverse events in HE (J Cardiac Fail 2009:15:435-441)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据