4.7 Article

Novel therapeutic strategy for neurodegeneration by blocking Aβ seeding mediated aggregation in models of Alzheimer's disease

期刊

NEUROBIOLOGY OF DISEASE
卷 74, 期 -, 页码 144-157

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.nbd.2014.08.017

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; A beta seeding-mediated aggregation; A beta-propagation; Amyloid protein; Drug discovery; Inhibitors

资金

  1. Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Lausanne
  2. Strauss Foundation
  3. NIH [AG18440, AG022074, AG031097, AG010435]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A beta accumulation plays a central role in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Recent studies suggest that the process of A beta nucleated polymerization is essential for A beta fibril formation, pathology spreading and toxicity. Therefore, targeting this process represents an effective therapeutic strategy to slow or block disease progression. To discover compounds that might interfere with the A beta seeding capacity, toxicity and pathology spreading, we screened a focused library of FDA-approved drugs in vitro using a seeding polymerization assay and identified small molecule inhibitors that specifically interfered with A beta seeding-mediated fibril growth and toxicity. Mitoxantrone, bithionol and hexachlorophene were found to be the strongest inhibitors of fibril growth and protected primary cortical neuronal cultures against A beta-induced toxicity. Next, we assessed the effects of these three inhibitors in vivo in the mThyl-APPtg mouse model of AD (8-month-old mice). We found that mitoxantrone and bithionol, but not hexachlorophene, stabilized diffuse amyloid plaques, reduced the levels of A beta(42) oligomers and ameliorated synapse loss, neuronal damage and astrogliosis. Together, our findings suggest that targeting fibril growth and A beta seeding capacity constitutes a viable and effective strategy for protecting against neurodegeneration and disease progression in AD. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据