4.6 Article

BMP-2 inhibits tumor-initiating ability in human renal cancer stem cells and induces bone formation

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00432-014-1883-0

关键词

BMP-2; Aldehyde dehydrogenase; Cancer stem cells; Renal cell carcinoma

类别

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01 AR 056649]
  2. Department of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have previously shown that BMP-2 induces bone formation and inhibits tumorigenicity of cancer stem cells (CSCs) in a human osteosarcoma OS99-1 cell line. In this study, we sought to determine whether BMP-2 can similarly induce bone formation and inhibit the tumorigenicity of renal CSCs identified based on aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) activity in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) cell lines and primary tumors. Using a xenograft model in which cells from human RCC cell lines ACHN, Caki-2, and primary tumors were grown in NOD/SCID mice, renal CSCs were identified as a subset of ALDH(br) cells. The ALDH(br) cells possessed a greater colony-forming efficiency, higher proliferative output, increased expression of stem cell marker genes Oct3/4A, Nanog, renal embryonic marker Pax-2, and greater tumorigenicity compared to cells with low ALDH activity (ALDH(lo) cells), generating new tumors with as few as 25 cells in mice. In vitro, BMP-2 was found to inhibit the ALDH(br) cell growth, down-regulate the expression of embryonic stem cell markers, and up-regulate the transcription of osteogenic markers. In vivo, all animals receiving a low number of ALDH(br) cells (5 x 10(3)) from ACHN, Caki-2, and primary tumor xenografts treated with 30 A mu g BMP-2 per animal showed limited tumor growth with significant bone formation, while untreated cells developed large tumor masses without bone formation. These results suggest that BMP-2 inhibits the tumor-initiating ability of renal CSCs and induces osseous bone formation. BMP-2 may therefore provide a beneficial strategy for human RCC treatment by targeting the CSC-enriched population.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据