4.5 Article

Enhancing precursors availability in Pichia pastoris for the overproduction of S-adenosyl-L-methionine employing molecular strategies with process tuning

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 188, 期 -, 页码 112-121

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2014.08.017

关键词

Pichia pastoris; S-Adenosyl-L-methionine; ATP; L-Methionine; Fed batch cultivation

资金

  1. Government of India
  2. Department of Biotechnology (DBT), Government of India

向作者/读者索取更多资源

S-Adenosyl-L-methionine (SAM) is an important metabolite having prominent role in treating various diseases. Due to increasing demand of SAM, improvement in its production is essential. For this purpose, S-adenosyl-L-methionine synthetase gene (sam2) was overexpressed in the present study, and we studied the effect of coexpression of methionine permease (mup1) and adenylate kinase (adkl) genes. From the recombinant strains expressing individual genes, we observed that SAM2 synthetase is the primary limiting factor and its overexpression is essential to increase the SAM productivity. Coexpression of mupl with sam2 did not enhance SAM production, while coexpression of adkl with sam2 improved SAM production, clearly indicating that ATP is the primary limiting precursor in SAM production. However, coexpression of all three genes synergistically improved SAM productivity with better L-methionine (L-met) conversion efficiency in every stage, and it was 77% more compared to overexpressing sam2 alone. Sparging pure oxygen reduced cultivation time. Feeding nitrogen source and additional L-met during induction phase enhanced SAM yield by 38.4% and 55.1%, respectively. Moreover, building up biomass before induction resulted in 145% increase in specific yield and 83% higher L-met conversion efficiency. This is the first report on increasing both the precursors L-met and ATP availability through molecular strategies using microorganisms for the production of SAM. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据