4.5 Article

Microstructure and biocompatibility of composite biomaterials fabricated from titanium and tricalcium phosphate by spark plasma sintering

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH PART A
卷 101, 期 5, 页码 1489-1501

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.34455

关键词

titanium; tricalcium phosphate; composites; bioactivity; hard tissue replacement

资金

  1. NRF
  2. MEST [2009-0092808]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Important issues in developing hydroxyapatite (HAp)- and titanium (Ti)-based composite biomaterials for orthopedic or dental devices include the dissociation of HAp during fabrication and its influences in the microstructure and biocompatibility of the final composite. During the densification by sintering of HAp/Ti composites, Ti reacts with OH freed from HAp to form TiO2 thus dissociated HAp into Ca3(PO4)2, CaO, CaTiO3, TiP, and so forth. To inhibit this reaction, composites were fabricated with Ti and 30, 50, and 70 vol % -tricalcium phosphate (-TCP) instead of HAp by spark plasma sintering at 1200 degrees C. It has been observed that after sintering at 1200 degrees C, Ti also reacted with TCP, but unlike HAp/Ti composites, the final TCP/Ti composites contained significant amounts of unreacted TCP and Ti phases. The initial 70 vol % TCP/Ti composite showed compressive strength of 388.5 MPa, Young's modulus of 3.23 GPa, and Vickers hardness of 361.9 HV after sintering. The in vitro cytotoxicity and proliferation of osteoblast cells on the composites surfaces showed that the addition of a higher amount of TCP with Ti was beneficial by increasing cell viability, cellcomposite attachment and proliferation. Osteopontin and collagen type II protein expression from osteoblasts cultured onto the 70% TCPTi composite was also higher than other composites and pure Ti. In vivo study verified that within 3 months of implantation in an animal body, 70% TCPTi had an excellent boneimplant interface compared with a pure Ti metal implant. (c) 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A, 2013.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据