4.5 Article

The interplay of bone-like extracellular matrix and TNF-α signaling on in vitro osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH PART A
卷 100A, 期 5, 页码 1097-1106

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.34058

关键词

bone tissue engineering scaffold; extracellular matrix; mesenchymal stem cells; osteogenesis; inflammation

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01 DE17441, R01 AR57083]
  2. NIH [5 T32 GM008362-19]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As an initial step in the development of a bone tissue engineering strategy to rationally control inflammation, we investigated the interplay of bone-like extracellular matrix (ECM) and varying doses of the inflammatory cytokine tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-a) on osteogenically differentiating mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) cultured in vitro on 3D poly(e-caprolactone) (PCL) microfiber scaffolds containing pregenerated bone-like ECM. To generate the ECM, PCL scaffolds were seeded with MSCs and cultured in medium containing the typically required osteogenic supplement dexamethasone. However, since dexamethasone antagonizes TNF-a, the interplay of ECM and TNF-a was investigated by culturing naive MSCs on the decellularized scaffolds in the absence of dexamethasone. MSCs cultured on ECM-coated scaffolds continued to deposit mineralized matrix, a late stage marker of osteogenic differentiation. Mineralized matrix deposition was not adversely affected by exposure to TNF-a for 48 days, but was significantly reduced after continuous exposure to TNF-a over 16 days, which simulates the in vivo response, where brief TNF-a signaling stimulates bone regeneration, while prolonged exposure has damaging effects. This underscores the exciting potential of PCL/ECM constructs as a more clinically realistic in vitro culture model to facilitate the design of new bone tissue engineering strategies that rationally control inflammation to promote regeneration. (C) 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part A, 2012.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据